Forgot Password - Student Panel

Welcome to Edu Test Series. To ensure a productive results and disciplined learning environment, please follow the guidelines below:

🔹 Conduct & Discipline
Professionalism & Punctuality: Be available for all scheduled tests, doubt classes and mentorship sessions.
Respectful Behavior: Maintain courtesy and respect in all interactions with faculty, mentors and fellow students.
Academic Integrity: Avoid any form of malpractice during tests or assignments.

🔹 Learning Environment
Clean Digital Space: Keep your login details confidential and ensure your device is organized for study.
Dress Appropriately (Live Sessions): Present yourself neatly during any video-based classes or discussions.

🔹 Accountability
Follow Instructions: Adhere to the guidelines shared by Edu Test Series coordinators, mentors and evaluators.
Assignment & Test Submission: Complete and submit all assigned work on time for timely feedback.
Let’s build a serious and supportive community for future professionals. Stay focused, stay disciplined.

Evaluation Guidelines for Checkers – Edu Test Series

1. Evaluation Process
Checkers must access each student’s file via the Edu Test Series dashboard, including the question paper and the corresponding answer key. Evaluation must be carried out strictly in accordance with the official marking scheme provided by the institute. Comments or remarks should be added on a question-by-question basis; bulk or assumptive marking is not permitted. Where available, checkers should utilize digital annotation or highlight tools to indicate areas of strength or concern directly on the answer script.

2. Feedback Guidelines
Providing clear, constructive, and personalized feedback is mandatory. Checkers are expected to offer individual comments for each question, identifying mistakes and suggesting improvements. An overall performance remark must be included at the end of the script, summarizing key observations and offering actionable suggestions. Remarks should be original and thoughtfully written—copy-pasting from the answer key is strictly prohibited. Feedback must reflect an accurate evaluation of the student’s responses in relation to the answer sheet provided.

3. Marking Standards
All marking must be fair, consistent, and fully aligned with the official solution key. Personal opinions or leniency must not influence the evaluation unless explicitly authorized by the academic team. For structured or multi-step questions, marks should be awarded progressively, giving credit for partial understanding where applicable. Accuracy and neutrality are essential at all times.

4. Timeline & Deadlines
All assigned evaluations must be completed within 24 to 48 hours of assignment. Timely evaluation is critical for maintaining academic schedules and student progress. Delays without prior notice may result in deductions from the agreed payment. Uninformed or unapproved absences will lead to withholding of remuneration, and forfeiture may occur if necessary.

5. Confidentiality
All student submissions, question papers, and evaluation records are strictly confidential. Under no circumstances should checkers, store or share this material outside the Edu Test Series platform or for personal use. Any violation of this policy will result in immediate termination of services and may trigger legal action under applicable data protection laws.

1. Dashboard Monitoring

The coordinator must actively monitor the test series dashboard to track the status of all answer sheets submitted by students. These will be categorized as Pending (submitted but not yet assigned), Assigned (currently with a checker), and Checked (evaluated and submitted by the checker). Regular tracking ensures timely processing and prevents backlog in evaluation.

2. Managing Pending Sheets

Pending sheets must be reviewed daily to check for completeness, errors, or submission mismatches. The coordinator should prioritize sheets based on their submission date or urgency, if marked accordingly. Once reviewed, these sheets should be queued for assignment to the relevant checkers based on subject expertise and current workload distribution.

3. Assigning to Checkers

Using the dashboard interface, the coordinator should assign answer sheets to available checkers, ensuring a fair and balanced workload. Each assignment should be recorded with details such as the subject, checker’s name, and date of assignment. The coordinator must also verify that checkers receive all necessary documents, including the corresponding question paper and the official marking scheme, to ensure consistency in evaluation.

4. Follow-Up on Assigned Sheets

It is essential to track the time taken by each checker to complete evaluations. A standard evaluation turnaround time is 2 working days, should be enforced. The coordinator should send timely reminders if checkers exceed the allotted time, and if required, reassign sheets to ensure deadlines are met. This process helps maintain the flow of checked copies without delays.

5. Review of Checked Sheets

After a checker marks a paper, the coordinator should perform a preliminary review to ensure that every answer is evaluated, feedback (if required) is appropriately given, and the marking is aligned with the official scheme. Random quality checks on checked sheets should be conducted to maintain evaluation standards and address any inconsistencies or errors in marking.

6. Checker Management

The coordinator is responsible for creating and maintaining checker profiles with accurate information such as full name, email address, and mobile number. Staff login credentials must be issued with clearly defined access based on subject areas or exam levels. Coordinators should also maintain open lines of communication with checkers through email, phone, or WhatsApp for quick resolution of queries, clarification of doubts, or in cases where rechecking is needed.

7. Escalation Protocol

Any issues such as repeated delays, poor evaluation quality, or non-responsiveness from a checker should be documented and escalated to the academic head or platform administrator. Proper logs of such instances must be maintained to identify performance gaps and improve the overall workflow.